FANDOM


  • LegendofNickson
    LegendofNickson closed this thread because:
    Choice 2 wins. The template will be now unofficial.
    08:33, August 11, 2017

    Really, this template is no different to an Absolute Support. It is basically just a voting template that is a support, nothing else. No point boost, just 1 support. Also nowadays it is not used very often. We should make this unofficial because the oppose counterpoint, Template:AntiNike, is unofficial.

    In case you're wondering:

    NikeJust do it
    This is the Nike template


    Choice #1
    Make this unofficial and remove it (redirect it to AbsoluteSupport)


    Choice #2
    Make this unofficial but keep it


    Choice #3
    Keep it official


    Note: To select your chosen choices(s), type | and then the choice number(s) inside the {{VoteNumber}} template. You must have been on the wiki for two weeks and have made 25 mainspace edits to vote.
    Note: In order to be able to vote on mainspace related voting threads, you need at least 25 mainspace edits and you must have been on the wiki for two weeks. For any other topic, you must have been on the wiki for four weeks. If you do not follow these rules your vote will be disqualified. If you do it repeatedly, you will be given a forum warning. Thank you.
      Loading editor
    • NikeJust do it
      I used i good template....... I think its pointless to have both, but leave the option to choose there. Give them more say in voting

      What you're looking for is choice 3. -Teacup terry

      Not really. -Insanitor101

        Loading editor
    • Sort-neutralNeutral
      It's been used a ton of times and removing this option would not bring some good things to some people but at the same time, it's counterpart is unofficial so...
        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      There's no harm in having it around, but it being official is another matter.


        Loading editor
    • Choice #3
      It's just a silly little support alternative. No need to remove it.


        Loading editor
    • Sort-neutralNeutral
      It's ridiculous and can be annoying, but it isn't necessary to be all serious and use only "Supports"... it's good to spice things up sometimes... and it doesn't necessarily need to have an official counterpart...
        Loading editor
    • Choice #3-Neutral
      I quite like it, and it's pretty funny somethings, but the trend is kinda over now...


        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      Just because some people think that it requires no reason. And it's fine if they off the important threads, users still like to use it.


        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      Having this template is fine, but seeing those in the important votes looks... Rather unprofessional.


        Loading editor
    • Sort-neutralNeutral
      It really doesn't matter. It's fun but there's no functional difference.
        Loading editor
    • Choice #3
      i dont know why being professional is a requirement, it's just a support template. i think someone has a little something against "just do it". LaserBeanEyesLaserBeanEyes


        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      It's a nice template to have, but it should be used for fun purposes, not professional votes.


        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      It's fun to use, but only meant to be used for fun.


        Loading editor
    • Sort-neutralNeutral
      Pretty useful on some situations, but with its meme-based phrase, it still should not be used officially.
        Loading editor
    • Teacup Terry wrote:

      Choice #3
      It's just a silly little support alternative. No need to remove it.


      Remove =/= unofficialize.

        Loading editor
    • Sort-neutralNeutral
      Why does it matter?
        Loading editor
    • Choice #3
      It is always considered "MegaAbsoluteSupport", though


        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      It's a nice template to have. However, it's simply a Support.


        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      This is only a support and only for fun. Why put it on important threads as official templates for them?


        Loading editor
    • Choice #2
      There are many unoriginal templates from its original counterpart. It's just fine to be out from the voting threads, as it serves a little unseriousness on that respective voting thread.


        Loading editor
    • Insanitor101
      Insanitor101 removed this reply because:
      nope nada nedo
      17:07, August 8, 2017
      This reply has been removed
    • Insanitor101
      Insanitor101 removed this reply because:
      nope
      17:07, August 8, 2017
      This reply has been removed
    • Insanitor101 wrote:
      Choice #3
      I used i good template....... I think its pointless to have both, but leave the option to choose there. Give them more say in voting
      What you're looking for is choice 3. -Teacup terry

      Terry why do you keep doing that? Isn't it a lot easier just to quote it?

      VeXJL: That is besides the point. It's usually better to just do it like that so you don't notify everyone of something like that.

        Loading editor
    • Happy-shroom wrote:
      Insanitor101 wrote:
      Choice #3
      I used i good template....... I think its pointless to have both, but leave the option to choose there. Give them more say in voting
      What you're looking for is choice 3. -Teacup terry
      Terry why do you keep doing that? Isn't it a lot easier just to quote it?

      VeXJL: That is besides the point. It's usually better to just do it like that so you don't notify everyone of something like that.

      I already know I suck at these voting template things, I think everybody knows it, I would much rather have HELP knowing whether to use support or nike or choice 4 or chicken wings or what

        Loading editor
    • Happy-shroom wrote:
      Insanitor101 wrote:
      Choice #3
      I used i good template....... I think its pointless to have both, but leave the option to choose there. Give them more say in voting
      What you're looking for is choice 3. -Teacup terry
      Terry why do you keep doing that? Isn't it a lot easier just to quote it?

      VeXJL: That is besides the point. It's usually better to just do it like that so you don't notify everyone of something like that.

      True, but sometimes I don't check old comments. Whatevs. Plus if that was the point then insanitor quoting it ruined it

        Loading editor
    • Oh so I'M the guy making the mistakes now alomg with sucking at voting? Unbeliveable!

        Loading editor
    • Being the one who created it, I originally intended its use to be when a thread did not need to exist and if the user in question was bold, they would not raise any eyebrows.

      It didn't work out that way, didn't it?

        Loading editor
    • the way the template is used is exactly how you're suggesting it, brainulator.

      i dont agree with this thread, but it's going to win so it doesnt even matter.

        Loading editor
    • Brainulator9 wrote: Being the one who created it, I originally intended its use to be when a thread did not need to exist and if the user in question was bold, they would not raise any eyebrows.

      It didn't work out that way, didn't it?

      Choice #3
      It should be kept official only if a given thread should be boldly be implemented (aka, "it's obvious enough that needed to be done") that is treated as a regular support if valid or else, it's a disqualify.

      It's just better to keep it official instead of just going with the redundancy of using two templates just for "that purpose", which consumes even more data.


        Loading editor
    • Choice #3
      going to agree with crazyman and wikiboy, i dont see why professionality has be brought up here, and i agree with how it should be used in AWB's context.


        Loading editor
    • ThisUserLikesOreo
      ThisUserLikesOreo removed this reply because:
      19:17, August 9, 2017
      This reply has been removed
    • Brainulator9 wrote: Being the one who created it, I originally intended its use to be when a thread did not need to exist and if the user in question was bold, they would not raise any eyebrows.

      It didn't work out that way, didn't it?

      Isn't that how it's used anyway? Like saying "Duh, of course we need to do this?"

        Loading editor
    • Choice #3
      There's nothing wrong with the Nike template. It is an alternative to a Support, and that's it. The difference is that it expresses something the Support template doesn't. If something should be obviously supported, then Nike is there for it. Besides, it's not like it could be exploited to unbalance the voting system, so it's alright. The AntiNike on the other hand is poorly designed. "Just don't it" isn't catchy, and besides, "Just do it" is the original.


        Loading editor
    • Changing:

      Choice #3
      What exactly is wrong with keeping it official? It's basically a support with the reason "it's obvious" built in.


        Loading editor
    • Insanitor101 wrote: Oh so I'M the guy making the mistakes now alomg with sucking at voting? Unbeliveable!

      No, it means you just made a stance that is confusing and not specific, which reminds me.....


      Insanitor101 wrote:

      NikeJust do it
      I used i good template....... I think its pointless to have both, but leave the option to choose there. Give them more say in voting
      Plants-Vs-ZombiesDisqualified vote
      An unspecific stance that is vague and confusing to determine what exactly is the intended stance.

      To make sure it's not disqualified, please use the Choice or VoteNumber template outside the Nike template you just used in order to make your stance easily counted.

        Loading editor
    • Current results:

      • Choice #1 - 0
      • Choice #2 - 8
      • Choice #3 - 7
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message